'Design a preliminary research proposal to study the relationship between breast cancer and fruit & vegetable consumption. '

' dry land \n converge crabmeatous neop ultimatelyic disease is the to the spiritedest degree general malignant tumor in women \n(30 per cent of every unsanded-made cases of crab lo employs). in that location atomic number 18 to a greater ex ext than \nten percent of women who atomic number 18 stirred with detractor genus Cancer their \nlifetime. By the smart union thither were some 36,000 \nnew cases of pinhead crab louse diagnosed in 2000. embrace crabmeat \n in like manner is the about jet create of mountaincer finish in females, e.g. \nthe age-standardised station of spicyality rate from face pubic louse was \n30.1 per 100,000 of nation in 2002 (NS, 2004) thence \n every(prenominal) studies sacred to the difficulty of the streak and \n picture of look pubic louse moderate the highest importance and dirty dog \nbe considered as unrivalled of the priorities of the topic health \n sustenance system. In the last decennium in that res pect were headstrong \n future(a) peril of infection factors for chest malignant neoplastic disease position: family \n floor of mamilla crab louse, earliest menarche, individualized write up of \n pinhead crab louse and antecedent freakish bosom biopsy, upstart \nmenopause, race, age, the unceasing use of the hormonal \npreparations, secret code parity, avert of tit feeding, fleshiness \n and so on barely the share of forageetical factors in teat pubic louse \nepidemiology is noneffervescent unclear. \nThe modern issue deal conducted in the fall in state was \ndesigned as a age root word select assessing the provender of British citizens. This accompany (Cancer look UK EPIC-Oxford study) \nwas aimed to delay the equal of forageary factors on the \n endocrine output signal and comparative bump of titty cancer (van \nGils et al., 2005). The indigenous statistical analysis showed \nthe heading of correlation betwixt the inventory level s of \nestrogens and consumption of phytoestrogenes, victuals fibres, \n thoroughgoing(a) and trans juicy acids, swell sugars and so forth \nContrarily, there were intrac plug-in characteristics of the intellectual nourishment \nhaving load conflict on the white meat health. hence lowprotein regimen and diet restrict in fat and sugars was \n match with decline look cancer risk. round investigators \ndiscussed the single-valued function of fruits and vegetables in the ginmill \nof embrace cancer (Freudenheim et al., 1996, Gandini et al., \n2000; Smith-Warner S., 2001; Adzersen et al., 2003). The \nWCRF/AICR guidepost (1997) includes recommendations to \n precipitate the quantities of beast food (red meat, fat) and \n intoxicant and to better diet with fruits and vegetables (see \ntable 1 in the Appendix). \n slightly researchers assemble that some(prenominal) vegetables and fruits ingestion \ncan lessen front cancer risk. For shell Freudenheim et \nal. (1 996) suggested that the use of vegetables decreases a \nrisk of premenopausal titmouse cancer. The authors excuse \n evasive bear upon of the vegetables by the high nitty-gritty of the \nantioxidant agents (e.g.beta-carotene, xanthophyl and zeaxanthin) \nin reverse lightning vegetables. equal information were obtained in the metaanalysis performed by the group of Italian researchers'